Collectively Speaking
The team’s visit to Japan last week yielded a number of interesting conversations in Tokyo, Osaka, and Kyoto. In addition to speaking with local business leaders and academics, we also had a chance to speak with some western MNC “top talent” professionals who were in Japan to visit their local office.
Asking about the point we noted last week — that things seem to work in Japan — we got a lot of answers that followed one common theme: things work in Japan because there’s a feeling of collectivism, like “we are all in this together,” so people work together to make everything go as smoothly as possible. The railroad engineer wants his food to be good, and the restaurant owner wants her train to be on-time, so both do their job the best they can so that everyone benefits.
That contrasts with cultural attitudes that are common in the rest of Asia, especially the kaisu mentality (a Hokkien term) of being “afraid to lose out,” which can lead people to constantly feel like they are in competition, rather than collaboration, with others in their society. Many business leaders (and not just in Asia, of course) promote a kaisu mentality in their company, figuring that if everyone is competing against each other, they will all perform better. That may or may not be true, but as we see in Japanese society, a collaborative attitude can also yield some pretty good results.
That’s not to say that this collectivism is a perfect solution for creating a high-performance culture. It has one particular drawback that hurts companies: in the words of one researcher, in Japan “the nail that stands highest is the first to get hit by the hammer.” The practical outcome of this is that innovation is limited, because standing out in the crowd — whether for success or failure — increases the chances of getting smacked down.
How do you bring a more collaborative attitude into your company without the risk-aversion and groupthink that can come with it? One way might be to be very, very clear about your expectations. In Japan, the expectation seems to be “we will work together to keep things steady.” But if you are trying to grow your company, you need to set new expectations and make it clear that success and failure of new ideas will be disruptive, and thats’s OK. You need a performance review system and rewards that recognize collaboration AND creativity, and that do not penalize people for constructive failure.
If you can get people to work together for group success, that’s great, and if you can also get them to be willing to take chances and try new ideas, that’s even better. You don’t need to do things exactly like they do them in Japan, but if you can borrow some of that collective attitude, it can carry your entire organization a long way.
- Posted by
Designing Leaders - Posted in Culture
Feb, 22, 2018
Comments Off on Collectively Speaking
Categories
- Book Reviews
- Change
- Communication
- COVID-19
- Creativity & Innovation
- Culture
- Diversity & Inclusion
- Employee Development
- Ethics
- Free Agents
- Health and Balance
- Leader Development
- Leading
- Management
- New Leaders
- Planning
- Recruiting and Retention
- Uncategorized
Archives
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014


Feb, 22, 2018